On the surface this appears entirely political and there is no excuse for targeting political affiliation for tax cuts. However, the commissioner of the IRS that has just recently resigned, Steven Miller, said that "while 'intolerable', it 'was not an act of partisanship'". But how much should we trust one of the men that was supposedly involved in this scandal?
It seems as if this scandal was clearly intentional, drawing skepticism with whether President Obama was involved. Obama claims that this act was "inexcusable", trying to emphasize that he was not involved. But who do we believe? The president, the IRS, the organizations wanting exemptions? This is a very sticky situation and until more details come out it is difficult to target who is too blame. Nevertheless, this was unconstitutional and warrants serious repercussions including a criminal investigation for those involved. It is completely unjust to determine tax exemptions on political affiliation and this sort of activity must be monitored in the future.

How do you think this issue would be different if it was a particular race being targeted as oppose to support of a political party? And how much do you think the media has to do with the attention of certain events? Please comment below.
No comments:
Post a Comment