The next
presidential election is coming up this November and we are starting to see ads
on TV. Every year these campaigns seem to focus more on the shortcomings
of the other candidate than the advantages of themselves. I read an article
explaining how many candidates stretch the truth and take quotes out of
context. Brooks Jackson, the director of factcheck.org, said
that, "at various points this year both sides have blithely gone on
repeating statements that were found false." He went on to say
"'They don’t care...because it gets votes."' Obviously
candidates want more votes, but why can't they be truthful? Instead of talking
about the disadvantages of your competitor, candidates should talk about the
advantages of electing them. Mitt Romney released a video last year that
focused on the mistakes of Obama. Political views aside, it is not ethical
to talk about how bad a specific candidate is no matter what one's stance or
opinion is. Why do you think that political figures always say the
problems with the other candidate? And do you think this is ethical?
Jeremy, I agree that it is unethical to maliciously attack your opponent but this is simply how politics works. No matter what you are running for, whether it is President of the U.S or treasurer for your middle school, part of politics is pointing out flaws with your opponent and glorifying your own. It is important for people to realize what it is they are voting for and I do actually believe that recognizing the flaws of our leader helps us make more educated decisions for who we want to elect into office. I agree however that lying through misleading facts are not a fair part of the recent political campaigns. I wrote a similar blog about lying in politics as we heard at the Republican National Convention. I think you would enjoy reading my post. This was a very enjoyable read! I look forward to hearing more from you.
ReplyDeletehttp://noahquinn95.blogspot.com